Multi-Party Coordination: Where ERP Workflows Break Down
- Tayana Solutions
- 1 day ago
- 5 min read
The Coordination Challenge
ERPs excel at linear workflows within single departments. They struggle with multi-party coordination requiring communication across boundaries. Understanding where workflows break down reveals AI agent value proposition.
Reality: 60-70% of ERP exceptions involve multi-party coordination that ERPs cannot automate.
Where Coordination Breaks Down
Breakdown 1: Cross-Department Coordination
Scenario: Vendor bill doesn't match purchase order
Parties involved:
Accounts Payable (owns the bill)
Receiving (verified what was received)
Purchasing (created the PO)
Sometimes: Requestor who initiated purchase
ERP workflow:
Flags 3-way match failure
Creates task for AP
Stops (requires human coordination)
What ERP cannot do:
Contact Receiving to verify partial shipment
Coordinate with Purchasing if PO needs amendment
Follow up with requestor about quantity discrepancy
Track coordination across parties
Ensure resolution timeline
Manual coordination required:
AP sends email to Receiving: "Did we receive full shipment?"
Receiving checks records, responds
If partial shipment, AP contacts Purchasing: "Can we amend PO?"
Purchasing amends or advises
AP processes payment or disputes with vendor
Time consumed: 15-30 minutes per exception
Frequency: 20-40% of vendor bills in growing companies
Breakdown 2: Internal-External Coordination
Scenario: Customer claims invoice doesn't match delivery
Parties involved:
Customer (reporting issue)
AR staff (owns customer relationship)
Shipping/delivery (has proof of delivery)
Sales (may need to verify original order)
Sometimes: Warehouse (original pick/pack)
ERP workflow:
No automatic workflow exists
Entirely manual coordination
What ERP cannot do:
Contact customer for details
Gather proof of delivery from shipping
Coordinate investigation across departments
Track progress to resolution
Ensure customer communication
Manual coordination required:
Customer emails AR about discrepancy
AR investigates with shipping
Shipping provides POD
AR coordinates with sales if order question
AR responds to customer with findings
If customer correct, credit processed
If customer incorrect, AR explains with evidence
Time consumed: 30-60 minutes per exception
Frequency: 10-15% of invoices in industries with complex delivery
Breakdown 3: Multi-Time-Zone Coordination
Scenario: International customer payment issue requiring coordination
Parties involved:
Customer (different time zone)
AR staff (US-based)
Bank (may be third time zone)
Sometimes: Freight forwarder, customs broker
ERP workflow:
None (entirely manual)
What ERP cannot do:
Coordinate communication across time zones
Handle async communication efficiently
Track follow-up timing
Manage multiple communication threads
Manual coordination required:
Email customer (they respond 12 hours later due to time difference)
Wait for response before next step
Multiple days for simple coordination
Easy to lose track of status
Time consumed: Multiple touches over 3-5 days
Frequency: 20-30% of international transactions
Breakdown 4: Async Multi-Party Workflows
Scenario: Credit memo requires approval from multiple parties
Parties involved:
Customer (requesting credit)
AR staff (investigating)
Warehouse (verifying return)
Quality control (inspecting returned goods)
Controller (approving credit over threshold)
ERP workflow:
Serial approval routing exists
But doesn't handle investigation/coordination phase
What ERP cannot do:
Coordinate investigation across parties
Handle parallel information gathering
Track who's waiting on whom
Follow up on delays
Communicate status to customer
Manual coordination required:
AR creates task for warehouse
Warehouse verifies return (1-3 days)
Creates task for QC if needed
QC inspects (1-2 days)
AR compiles information, requests controller approval
Controller approves
AR processes and notifies customer
Time consumed: 5-7 days, multiple touchpoints
Frequency: 15-20% of credit requests
Why ERPs Can't Handle This
Limitation 1: Communication Outside System
ERP capability:
Route tasks between users inside ERP
Send automated emails for notifications
What's missing:
Cannot conduct conversations
Cannot gather information from external parties
Cannot coordinate when parties don't use ERP
Cannot handle back-and-forth negotiation
Result: Staff becomes coordinator, using email/phone outside ERP
Limitation 2: Conditional Multi-Path Logic
ERP capability:
Linear approval workflows
Simple conditional routing (if amount > X, route to Y)
What's missing:
Complex decision trees with multiple paths
Parallel information gathering
Conditional escalation based on responses
Learning from outcomes
Result: Exceptions requiring judgment fall to manual handling
Limitation 3: Time-Based Follow-Up
ERP capability:
Schedule tasks for specific dates
Send reminder notifications
What's missing:
Intelligent follow-up based on context
Escalation when no response
Adaptive timing based on customer patterns
Multi-touch sequences
Result: Staff manually tracks follow-up timing
Limitation 4: Relationship Context
ERP capability:
Store data about accounts
Track transaction history
What's missing:
Understanding relationship dynamics
Applying relationship context to decisions
Balancing firm follow-up with relationship preservation
Customer-specific communication approach
Result: Staff provides relationship judgment, ERP provides data only
AI Agent Coordination Capabilities
How AI Bridges Coordination Gaps
Multi-party communication:
Initiates contact with each party
Gathers information systematically
Tracks responses and status
Follows up on delays
Coordinates across participants
Example workflow:
AI identifies 3-way match failure
Calls receiving to verify shipment
Emails purchasing for PO amendment if needed
Contacts vendor about discrepancy
Updates AP with resolution path
Tracks to completion
Time reduction: 15-30 minutes becomes automated
Cross-Department Coordination
AI capability:
Knows which department owns which information
Routes inquiries appropriately
Tracks responses
Escalates if delays
Keeps all parties informed
Example:
Customer disputes invoice
AI gathers delivery proof from shipping
AI checks order details with sales
AI investigates with customer
AI provides resolution with evidence
Escalates to AR manager if complex
Coordination that took 3-5 days completed in 24 hours
Async Communication Handling
AI capability:
Sends inquiry, waits for response
Processes response when received
Determines next action
Continues multi-step process
Doesn't forget or lose track
Example:
International customer payment issue
AI emails customer (their timezone)
Waits for response (12 hours)
Processes response, determines next step
Contacts bank if needed
Follows up with customer
Tracks to resolution
No staff coordination burden, completes in background
Coordination Patterns AI Handles
Pattern 1: Information Gathering
Workflow:
Identify information needed
Determine who has information
Contact appropriate party
Receive and process response
Repeat if additional information needed
Compile and provide to decision maker or customer
AI automation rate: 70-80%
When escalates: Information unavailable, conflicts, judgment required
Pattern 2: Status Communication
Workflow:
Customer asks about status
Check current state in ERP
Identify who's working on it
Get update from responsible party
Communicate to customer
Follow up if promised timeline passes
AI automation rate: 80-90%
When escalates: Complex issues, customer dissatisfaction
Pattern 3: Resolution Coordination
Workflow:
Exception identified
Investigate with multiple parties
Determine resolution approach
Coordinate execution across parties
Verify completion
Update systems and communicate
AI automation rate: 60-70%
When escalates: Requires approval, policy exception, relationship sensitivity
Volume and Impact
Coordination Exception Volume
Typical mid-market company ($50M revenue):
AR coordination exceptions: 30-50 monthly
AP coordination exceptions: 20-30 monthly
Order exceptions requiring coordination: 20-40 monthly
Total: 70-120 monthly coordination exceptions
Staff time per exception: 20-45 minutes average
Monthly coordination time: 25-50 hours
AI Impact on Coordination
Automation rate:
65-70% handled completely by AI
25-30% AI coordinates but escalates for decision
5-10% too complex, human coordination needed
Time savings:
Complete handling: 0 minutes (fully automated)
AI-coordinated escalations: 10-15 minutes (vs 30-45)
Complex: 30-45 minutes (unchanged)
Net savings: 16-30 hours monthly (60-70% reduction)
The Reality
ERP workflows break down with multi-party coordination: Cross-department (AP + Receiving + Purchasing), internal-external (Customer + AR + Shipping + Sales), multi-time-zone (async communication across 12+ hour delays), async multi-party (5-7 days multiple touchpoints).
Why ERPs can't handle: Communication outside system (staff becomes coordinator), conditional multi-path logic (complex decision trees), time-based follow-up (intelligent sequencing), relationship context (judgment needed).
AI bridges coordination gaps: Multi-party communication (initiates contact, gathers info, tracks responses), cross-department coordination (routes appropriately, tracks, escalates), async communication handling (waits for responses, continues process, doesn't forget).
Typical mid-market: 70-120 monthly coordination exceptions, 25-50 hours staff time.
AI impact: 65-70% handled completely, 25-30% AI coordinates but escalates for decision, 5-10% too complex. Net savings 16-30 hours monthly (60-70% reduction).
Multi-party coordination is where ERP automation ends and AI agent value begins.
About the Author: This content is published by ERP AI Agent.
Published: January 2025 | Reading Time: 6 minutes
Comments